Subject	slight summary on how these were taken>>>
Posted by	Tikigod on February 19, 2005 at 7:57 PM
	This message has been viewed 61 times.
In Reply To	NZR: AUTOX pics - you may enjoy these posted by Tikigod on February 19, 2005 at 07:07 PM
Message	for those that have asked me via IM or email as said all were taken with a Canon 10D + 70-200mm F/4 L lens. I ranged my exposure time from 1/60 to 1/90 in order to achieve that motion blur --- Fstop ranged from around F19 to F32 depending on light -- since the clouds kept coming in and out all day long. I shot over 700 pictures -- (havent gone threw them all) but I'll be honest I messed up alot too lol, but so it goes. Hopefully that clears up any confusion
Follow Ups	NZR: AUTOX pics - you may enjoy these - Tikigod 19:07:32 02/19/05 Awesome shots as usual (n/m) - U ZCREAM 19:10:19 02/19/05 Awesome! - Jason(MD) 19:13:26 02/19/05 ehhhh... - Endonesia 20:00:11 02/19/05 Is it me or do the numbers on those cars look entirely too - RAGTPZ(OH) 19:17:22 02/19/05 eh? - bjammmin (SoCal) 19:19:22 02/19/05 beat me too it -- but yeah (n/m) - Tikigod 19:20:14 02/19/05 Yeah, but they look just look PERFECT. Almost like they - RAGTPZ(OH) 19:21:58 02/19/05 nope nuffin like that lol (n/m) - Tikigod 19:22:51 02/19/05 I think it might be the contrast with the background that's - RAGTPZ(OH) 19:31:19 02/19/05 yep digital -- Canon 10D + 70-200mm f/4 L lens (n/m) - Tikigod 19:32:57 02/19/05 Very nice shots, those Elises are damn cool. (n/m) - Rage (SoCal) 19:22:57 02/19/05 Wow! Really cool shots. Neat how the car door is in focus - ConVerTT 19:27:38 02/19/05 I think the camera he uses can do that (n/m) - ZXRider(SoCal) 19:28:57 02/19/05 the pylon isn't moving. (n/m) - bjammmin (SoCal) 19:30:07 02/19/05 he hit the pylon (n/m) - Tikigod 19:32:30 02/19/05 Ahh! So it is because the pylon IS moving? (n/m) - ConVerTT 19:41:54 02/19/05 You have absolutely no understanding of how a camera works? (n/m) - Snoguitar 19:43:31 02/19/05 No not really. I was at a track event last summer with a - ConVerTT 19:46:01 02/19/05 then he wasnt doing it right.... its in the exposure time (n/m) - Tikigod 19:46:58 02/19/05 So what was your typical shutter speed? 1/60? (n/m) - cherryz 21:40:39 02/19/05 Re: So what was your typical shutter speed? 1/60? - my91z 21:47:04 02/19/05 yeah ranged from 1/30th to 1/60th >>>> - Tikigod 22:00:15 02/19/05 >> - bjammmin (SoCal) 19:46:20 02/19/05 Thanks (n/m) - ConVerTT 19:47:45 02/19/05 Velocity? - sfpearl300z 19:56:00 02/19/05 hahah yeah =) - bjammmin (SoCal) 20:01:45 02/19/05 bingo - thanks (n/m) - Tikigod 19:58:03 02/19/05 slight summary on how these were taken>>> - Tikigod 19:57:19 02/19/05 YOu need to include the "panning" part also. (n/m) - my91z 20:03:21 02/19/05 oops >>> - Tikigod 20:08:19 02/19/05 Nice shots. (n/m) - dvlhntr 20:42:06 02/19/05 nice pics. those "new" civics make me puke... (n/m) - BoostLesZ 01:14:40 02/20/05 The best shot right here - rave 12:32:47 02/20/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.